Category: Peer Responses

I liked how you grounded your discussion of inclusive learning design in your lived experience. The connection you made between seeing oneself represented in learning and developing confidence and motivation was well resonated. Additionally, the way you linked this to Microsoft’s Inclusive Design principles added a practical layer that educators could immediately apply. I liked your insight that inclusive design is not about making one version that fits everyone, rather, designing diverse pathways for participation.

I worry that some readers might not immediately grasp how your ideas could look in everyday classroom practice. I wonder if you could expand with a short example.

Your blog layout and visuals were polished and professional. I liked how the tables and embedded media supported readability.

I enjoyed how your post intertwined the UDL framework with inclusive learning design and real classroom practice. Your example about the “find a wolf or find a salmon” activity from your experience illustrated the idea of using diversity as a resource rather than a challenge. It shows how inclusivity can be lived out in daily teaching, not just planned on paper. I also appreciated how you connected Keller’s ARCS model to online learning environments.

I worry that readers new to UDL might miss how these ideas tie back to assessment design, since that is where barriers often reappear. I wonder if you could expand on how multiple means of action and expression could look in both synchronous and asynchronous settings.

Your blog layout was visually inviting and well-organized; the inclusion of your own photos added authenticity.

I liked how your post use real-world examples to connect Universal Design for Learning and Inclusive Learning Design. The part where you discussed how captions on lecture recordings can benefit all learners captured the core of inclusive design. Additionally, I liked your discussion of neurodivergent learning differences and how you highlighted both the challenges and the importance of exposing those differences. The example of the sensory room from the Edutopia video was a strong illustration of what inclusion looks like in practice.

I wonder if you could expand more on how educators might balance flexibility with maintaining academic discipline. For example, how might instructors ensure that multiple means of representation and engagement still align with shared learning goals? Exploring this tension could deepen your already strong argument that inclusion is a mindset, not a checklist.

Your blog was clearly organized and visually engaging. The use of tables and visuals made complex ideas about UDL and neurodiversity very approachable.

I really liked how you explained the difference between Bloom’s Taxonomy and the SOLO Taxonomy. It made the contrast between focusing on types of knowledge versus depth of understanding very clear. Your reflection on shifting from “term regurgitation” to deeper, inquiry-based learning also resonated with me. Additionally, I appreciated your example of using problem-based learning in psychopathology case studies. The step-by-step process you described shows how inquiry and reflection naturally reinforce each other.

I wonder if you could expand a bit more on how instructors might help students make that same shift from surface to deep learning. For instance, could aligning assessments with higher SOLO levels encourage students to think more critically? Exploring that connection might strengthen your already insightful discussion about motivation and metacognition.

Overall, your post did a great job connecting theory with authentic learning experiences.

I enjoyed reading your reflections, particularly, the connections you made between Backward Design and your game project for CSC 299. Your example of restarting after defining your outcomes clearly demonstrates how goal-oriented planning can turn frustration into motivation. I also appreciated how you tied Design Thinking to empathy and iteration in your work on the Saanich Peninsula Stroke Recovery Association website. The way you described feedback as an opportunity for growth rather than failure really aligns with the iterative spirit of design learning.

I wonder if you could expand a bit more on how these design principles might connect to teaching or learning environments. Overall, your post was thoughtful and clearly grounded in experience.

I enjoyed reading your blog post. I liked how you connected both school and life experiences to your learning journey. I found your comparison between learning in fitness and academics effective, it made the role of confidence in the ARCS model relatable.

I worry that the section on prior knowledge could go even deeper. I wonder if you could give an example of a university course where your tech familiarity helped you with the course material.

I also like that you included a personal photo, it makes your post feel welcoming. I wonder if adding one or two more images would help break up the text a bit more.

I enjoyed reading your blog post, Simon. It has a great balance of personal experiences and theory. I liked your description of the “Concept Book,” which is a creative way to process lecture material.

I worry that parts of your section on prior knowledge focus more on telling the story of the pandemic rather than tying it back to your current learning. I wonder if you could expand a bit more on how the hybrid experiences connect to your strategies today, maybe with a concrete example of a university course where those skills really helped.

I also like how your blog is structured with clear headings. I wonder if adding a couple of visuals, like a sample page from your “Concept Book” or a diagram, could make it even more interesting for readers.

I enjoyed reading your blog post. I liked the “tree of knowledge” metaphor for how you connect new information to what you already know. The image helps make your learning process easy to understand and memorable. I also found your example about studying CSC 320 with a group on Saturdays very interesting.

I worry that some sections, such as the ARCS model part, read more like a list than your personal reflection. I wonder if you could integrate another example from your own experience to make the points feel as personal as your story about React.

I also like how your post is organized with clear headings, making it easier to follow. I wonder if adding media, such as Youtube videos, could make it even more interesting.